Monday, May 24, 2010

What a bunch of wusses!

There is apparently something in New York called The Writers Room that rents space to writers and would-be writers to give them a place to work. A pretty cool concept, I think. But it's obviously populated with a bunch of wusses. Yep. Wusses. This article in the New York Daily News reports that a member of this little colony has been voted out because he uses, get this, a typewriter. Apparently the delicate nerves of the rest of the writers in this little colony are just too sensitive to deal with the muscular sound of words being slammed into shape by metal keys striking paper. Poor babies.

What's really funny is that the logo for The Writers Room is--get this--in a typewriter font!

It seems member Skye Ferrante took an eight-month hiatus from lugging his mother's 1929 Royal typewriter to his spot there and found, upon his return to the space he pays $1,400 a year for, that those in charge at The Writers Room had decided that all of the typewriter users had finally died off and such things would no longer be welcome in the quiet as can be confines of this high-minded colony of writers. They did relent and allow Ferrante to keep coming until his deal runs out at the end of June. Well, that was sure swell of them.

I know we all approach that scary void that is writing in different ways. Believe it or not, I still do rough drafts with a fountain pen and I even have some manual typewriters here I use to write rough drafts, letters and other things. I also compose on the computer many times but it's usually not my best work and it's usually not meant to be. My computer keyboard is where the workaday writing gets done. For things I care about, the best place to start is always with words directly on paper. I've got many reasons for that and chief among them is the ease of the delete key. I find many times I would like to have back words I deleted when I got distracted by the temptation to edit before my work was finished. I've already written about this process here in this blog, so I'll not go much deeper there--just scroll down.

I am prejudiced by my background here. I entered the newsroom after the days of typewriters on reporters' desks but not by much. And I learned to write under all kinds of pressure in a room without even the silencing effect of cubicles. It was just a bunch of desks shoved tight against each other and every desk was occupied by a reporter who was constantly talking on the phone, typing madly on the noisy keyboards of the early days of desktops and, oftentimes, the cacophony of reporters listening to tapes of interviews to try to double-check quotes on deadline. There was a copy desk still attached to the engraving department with pneumatic tubes. It was a noisy place and I cranked out 300 bylined stories a year in that din. And I never noticed. My words were always there in my head not hanging in that mid-air confusion of sound and furious activity.

Poor babies. They have to sit there in pristine silence with their own precious thoughts so ethereal that they could just drift away in the noise of someone banging those typewriter keys. Poor babies. I'm so sorry that writing is such a painful process like a migraine headache that requires a retreat to a dark, silent room to wrestle with the agony of getting words on the LCD. I'm sure their muses are such soft whispers that the sound of toilets flushing on the next floor up could drown out the most precious of nuggets of literary gold. Poor babies. It must be such a pity to have that thought stream broken by the sound of the doorknob being turned every time someone new enters the colony for a day's work. And, oh my God! That rustling sound of them taking off their coats! Really! I can't see how anybody can work in an environment so beset with noises that fracture the delicate dew-coated spiderwebs of words hanging right there in the mind. Poor babies.

Wusses.

Sunday, May 09, 2010

We'll Make it Up on Volume

Newsweek is up for sale. Another in a long series of media tales of collapse and change. The clip below from The Daily Show features the editor of Newsweek talking about the announcement of the sale and what it means, in his eyes, from the perspective of what is being lost in America as more of the traditional journalism outlets consolidate, shrink, close and simply drift away. Jon Stewart, as always, is razor sharp in pointing out the many realities of the world around him. And, in this case, it strikes me as being critical in that he notes that the "Emperor has no clothes" observation to be made about content aggregators is that they will have nothing to aggregate if nobody is around to do works of journalism. And we are fast approaching that time.

Meacham also notes that it's impossible to do quality journalism if people are unwilling to pay for it. And if that becomes the case, the audience will get exactly what it pays for--FOX News. All opinion and no reporting. Comment and analysis without journalism is empty. A meaningless, uninformed shell for deliberately uninformed people. And I think it's sad to face a potential reality of an American public that goes in a generation from being daily consumers--willing to pay for it--of news and information into an uninformed, easily inflamed, unthinking mob. I can remember the daily newspaper that showed up at my parent's house everyday. And we were clearly a working-class family complete with my mother being a stay-home mom and my dad carrying a lunch box out the door every day along with the tools of his carpentry and brick mason trades. No elites here. And at 6 p.m. every night, it was the local TV news from stations in the closest cities followed by the network news. We were an NBC household so it wasn't Uncle Walter.

I'm not advocating the clinging to print journalism. I think print on paper has lots of life left in it but it is much less life than we used to think and I believe that print will continue to shrink as the ad revenues that support continue to wither. But I also think that we have to get back to seeing that there is value in hard work and reporting. You can't aggregate what isn't there and, as Meacham points out, we don't see any of these various aggregators getting rich and building Rupert Murdoch style empires on content aggregation. It's as empty as the dot-com bubble with all of those companies that were losing money on every transaction who justified it with the statement that is at the head of this entry.

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Jon Meacham
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical HumorTea Party